1. General information:

Your name

Please state your gender
malefemalediversenot specified

What age group do you belong to?
16-24 years25-34 years35-49 years50-64 years65 years and oldernot specified

Please state your position
Top managementMiddle managementLower managementEmployees without personnel responsibilitySelf-employedOther

Please state your position/job title

Name of the consultant

Which DNLA tool was used?
Success profile social skillsManagementSales potentialLeadership qualitiesMSS stress measurement

Please enter the duration of the consultation in minutes.

The conversation was conducted as follows:
in persononlineby phone

2. STRUCTURE - The framework of the conversation:

Did you find the framework of the conversation suitable, or is there something that you think could be improved? (e.g. location, situation, duration, ...).

Was it clear what the goal of the conversation should be?
Yes, of courseNot quiteNot at all

Was the conversation well structured? If not, what could be improved?

Was it clear how DNLA differs from other tests and analysis methods? If so, what did you understand?

3. The DNLA potential analysis methods:

Was the content of the analysis explained in such a way that you could understand everything?
(In particular the benchmarks and comparison groups, the scale, and the individual factors with their content and meaning). If not, in which area was an explanation missing?

Was the meaning of the indicator for the response behavior discussed?
YesNo

Was the indicator for stress addressed?
YesNo

4. Personal reference:

During the conversation, the consultant got a precise picture of my situation.
YesNo

I could really identify with the results of the DNLA potential analysis
does not apply at allapplies a littlemoderatelyapplies fairly wellapplies very well

I find the results of the analysis and the conversation helpful for my future career path and for my current professional situation:
does not apply at allapplies a littlemoderatelyapplies fairly wellapplies very well

5. Benefit:

I have the feeling that the consultation about my DNLA analysis results has helped me personally.
does not apply at allapplies a littlemoderatelyapplies fairly wellapplies very well

I would also use DNLA advice again later.
does not apply at allapplies a littlemoderateapplies fairly wellapplies very well

I can recommend DNLA potential analyses as a consulting approach.
does not apply at allapplies a littlemoderateapplies fairly wellapplies very well

I can recommend my DNLA consultant.
does not apply at alldoes not apply very muchmoderatelyapplies fairly wellapplies very much

I am … ​​satisfied with the result of the consultation:
6-unsatisfactory5-poor4-adequate3-satisfactory2-good1-very good

The effort and benefit of the consulting service were in an appropriate ratio.
does not apply at alldoes not apply very muchmoderateapplies fairly wellapplies very much

6. Further steps:

I now know how I can work on certain factors / on building up my potential. If not, what was missing?

At the end, the consultant asked questions to ensure that we had addressed the most important topics.
YesNo

We agreed on another appointment for a check of my potential development (DNLA JEC).
YesNo, but I would like to make use of this opportunityNo

7. Assessment of DNLA and DNLA advice:

I know the following other tools:

Do you feel that DNLA has added value compared to these procedures?
If so, what is it?

How satisfied were you with DNLA? (School grade scale).
6-unsatisfactory5-poor4-sufficient3-satisfactory2-good1-very good

What is the value of such an analysis for you?

Personal comment/ your impression of DNLA and the DNLA consultation summarized:

May we publish this last statement (e.g. on the DNLA website)?
YesYes, but only if my name is mentionedNo

Bitte beweise, dass du kein Spambot bist und wähle das Symbol Flugzeug.